did u kno DEVIANT ART HAS A FUCKING BUTTON THAT DOES ALL THE SOURCING WORK FOR YOU
CLICK THE TUMBLR BUTTON (or whatever site you wish to post it to) AND LOOKIE HERE ASSHOLES
LOOK ALL YOU HAVE TO DO IS PICK WHICH BLOG YOU WANT IT TO GO ON AND CLICK PUBLISH POST YOU CAN EVEN QUE IT IF YOU GO ON ADVANCED POST
SO IF YOU COMPLAIN THAT SOURCING IS TO MUCH FUCKING WORK LOOK HERE DEVIANT ART HAS A BUTTON FOR IT YOU FUCKING LAZY CUNT
WAS THAT SO FUCKING HARD
Men’s Rights Activists, why do you think people are laughing at you?
It’s not because we think you shouldn’t have rights or that your problems don’t matter. I want men to be able to wear pink and drink fruity drinks and wear makeup and engage in other perhaps unfairly stereotypical “feminine” activities without getting harassed. Custody battles should be decided fairly without defaulting to the mother because she’s stereotyped, because of her gender, as a better caregiver. I hate that men are raped and don’t report it because it makes them feel emasculated. I think that the concept of masculinity that’s being pushed by our society is really messed up and extremely harmful to men.
The thing is, instead of spending five minutes researching what feminism is actually about and realizing that it actually would help ALL of the above issues, that we’d actually be on the same side here considering you give a crap about women (which is, well, in question), you’d rather start your own counter-movement (often IN OPPOSITION to feminism) about how your own problems matter more. “Why are we not talking specifically, exclusively about ME, right now?”
Feminism IS NOT and NEVER HAS BEEN about hating men. It’s not about women taking over the world and stripping men of all their rights. If you believe that, you’re operating under a faulty understanding of the issue and should do some research.
When you force your way into this discussion with an intense focus on men’s rights (or rights, as society would call them), you misunderstand the issue at best and belittle the systematic oppression of women around the world. When the issue you bring up is, “But I’M always expected to pay for dates!” then yes, people will laugh at you.
I will never not reblog this, because it just gives me so many feels.
aww.
this is cute and all, but it seems to have left out one of the most important parts of making a character: you have to be able to make them ABSOLUTELY MISERABLE.
Okay listen I can’t let this pass by anymore without an addendum.
I’m not sure if this comic was supposed to be aimed at a whole “how I feel about my characters” type of thing! But 90% of the replies to this are about people feeling this way for their characters, so I’m going to direct this at that whole mess.
If you’re aiming to write a story about your characters - like not just a silly for funsies series of disjointed friend adventures, an actual honest to God productive story - this is a horribly detrimental train of thought. Good stories thrive on conflict. If you think of your characters as your “children”, you’re going to have a hell of a time subjecting them to anything. If you want to follow this plan of action And for the sake of driving a story - for the sake of anything of actual merit happening in your story - your characters will need to suffer.I’m not saying you have to revel in their suffering - that can be equally detrimental, even. But you have to understand that for the sake of plot, and development, and all the most important things that drive a story, you can’t afford to give your characters everything they want.
You cannot afford to have your characters be your children. You can’t even afford to have them be people. They’re pawns, first and foremost, and should be treated as pawns in accordance to what’s best for a story, plot, concept, anything really.
(Source: psuedofolio)
In almost all the interviews and rare publicized asexual things, the interviewer often poses the question, what’s the point of speaking out as an asexual? How can you be fighting for the right to do nothing?
Well, we’re not fighting for the right to do nothing.
We’re fighting for the right to say no and not spend the next thirty minutes being grilled in a line of questions we’ve heard before trying to tell us about our own likes and desires when no we really honestly don’t have them.
ten inch dick aka longer than my forearm
i know there are some writers who follow me
please
take note
I believe the average is 6 inches? The longest is 14, an he suffers dizziness when he gets a boner, and even though he’s heterosexual, he can only have sex with men (or anally with women) as his cock can’t fit in a vagina.
So writers, take note.
jesus h. christ
I once had a boyfriend who was quite well-endowed, and that was some painful, annoying shit right there (especially with a selfish dude who didn’t really think about that/blamed me for being “tiny,” what the fuck). The average vagina is 3-4 inches deep, though some women may have a depth of 6-7 inches.
Of course, a lady’s Sarlaac Pit is designed to accomodate rather large things. That does not, however, mean that it is comfortable or fun to have those large things in your hermetically-sealed shame basket, not to mention have it ramming repeatedly against your cervix. Ow fucking ow.
Contrary to popular belief, bigger is NOT ALWAYS BETTER.
A rectum can be between 5-7 inches deep. A pliable dildo could push past that, taking that sharp curve into the large intestine, if you’re patient and flexible and you have a lot of lube at your disposal. And you don’t mind things being in your INTESTINES, oh my God. A hard dick, however, that isn’t so bendy, would be another story entirely.
So if you’re shooting for realistic sex and your bottom isn’t into pain, you may want to reconsider giving your top anything over 7-8 inches of dick. 10+ inches might sound awesome but like Communism, for most people at least, it’s better in theory than it is in practice.
This very NSFW and TMI-imbued post brought to you by all the fucks I do not give.
Oh and if anyone accuses me of kink shaming I will find you and I will skin you.
ive learned a lot today omg
i think the last of my innocence just got killed reading this
why am i reblogging this
this this this
my boyfriend is ~above average~ and it takes about an hour of foreplay for that shit not to fucking hurt
never understand the fascination with big dicks
(Source: flowercrownharry)
Dave Grohl (via austinkleon)
Syou-are-bolin submitted:
By Stjepan Seji, who worked on Witchblade. I figured that this picture and what he has to say is pretty relevant to this blog! You can read more of his interesting commentary on the DC reboot and female characters here.
“i am a great believer that sexuality in comics serves a purpose, and works best when earned through character development.
it is supposed to be subservient to the story, it needs to be given a better purpose than just… hey, look sex!”
This is good commentary! It’s what people keep saying about superhero comic art: it’s not that sex is inherently bad, it’s when sex becomes the main focus of character design, costume design, panel construction (the angles you choose, the focus, etc) and just the default way female characters seem to be portrayed that is an issue.
Art isn’t something that people typically base on real life. To get annoyed by someone’s choice of coloring a nose a little pink or not and then explaining why it isn’t possible pretty much takes out the fun of a “cartoon.” If cartoons were based on real life then there would be nothing much unique. Some people draw characters with no noses and even impossibly large noses. It’s just what people want to draw, my god this is the same thing as the person complaining about how people draw arms without joints. Maybe nose blush isn’t your cup of tea, but there’s no need to make this big of a deal out of a stylistic choice. No one is a lesser artist for doing so, maybe they’re not going for realistic, but something cute and let me tell you, most people who draw cute stuff do put blush everywhere. Knees and Elbows are a common place, are we going to make a big deal about that too?
First off, friend, I wasn’t taking the fun out of anyone’s time! I was explaining the details behind why this is a trend, and offering alternative solutions to the issue.
Problem solving is a good thing, embrace it! I know everyone’s probably nice and tired of this debate, but I feel like I need to made a quick addendum here. And this is going to branch off from the whole “how red is that nose” issue. I’m going into art as a whole here, and the act of stylization as a whole. I really don’t like to be this blunt or this frigid about the issue but:
“Art isn’t something that people typically base on real life.”
I need every artist who follows me to understand not only how completely upside-down dead wrong this statement is, but that this train of thought is a quick and easy way to hurt yourself as an artist. The entire point of stylization is to take what occurs in real life and simplify it. It’s taking actual things and turning them into easily recognizable symbols, and applying them to a fantasy setting. If your audience cannot immediately recognize that symbol as a nose, or an eye, or an arm, you are going to have severe issues keeping your viewers in the loop with you. Even the craziest, most whacked-out fantasy cartoons are going to have one foot in reality. You can’t afford not to have that. Something has to be recognizable here, or your audience has nothing to latch onto.
KNOWING THE RULES WILL HELP YOU BREAK THEM MORE EFFECTIVELY. And I want you to break the rules! Break them hard! Make them cry! I want to see whacked out noses and noodle arms and crazy angles. But the best way to make that look good is to KNOW WHAT YOU’RE STYLIZING. KNOW EXACTLY WHAT RULES YOU’RE BREAKING, AND WHY. KNOW WHY YOU ARE BREAKING THE RULES THE WAY YOU ARE. Does it fit better with the rest of the drawing? Does it help get across the theme or mood you want it to? If you have a solid reason for it, your drawing will show it! Confidence and knowledge affects every part of a piece!
(Source: burnishable)
How can you tell when you are in a room, restroom, motel etc. with a mirror or a 2-way glass?
Here’s how: I thought it was quite interesting! And I know in about 30 seconds you’re going to do what I did and find the nearest mirror.
Do you know how to determine if a mirror is 2-way or not? A policewoman who travels all over the US and gives seminars and techniques for businesswomen passed this on….
When we visit toilets, bathrooms, hotel rooms, changing rooms, etc., how many of you know for sure that the seemingly ordinary mirror hanging on the wall is a real mirror, or actually a 2-way mirror (i.e., they can see you, but you can’t see them)? There have been many cases of people installing 2-way mirrors in female changing rooms . It is very difficult to positively identify the surface by looking at it.
So, how do we determine with any amount of certainty what type of mirror we are looking at?
TWO WAY GLASS IMAGE MIRROR IMAGE
Just conduct this simple test: Place the tip of your fingernail against the reflective surface and if there is a GAP between your fingernail and the image of the nail, then it is GENUINE mirror. However, if your fingernail DIRECTLY TOUCHES the image of your nail, then BEWARE! IT IS A 2-WAY MIRROR!
“No Space, Leave the Place” So remember, every time you see a mirror, do the “fingernail test.” It doesn’t cost you anything.
REMEMBER. No Space, Leave the Place:
Ladies: Share this with your girlfriends, sisters, daughters, etc.
Men: Share this with your wives, daughters, daughters-in-law, mothers, girlfriends and/or friends.
